Which statement is true regarding Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE)?

The statement about Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) being related to potential causes like sepsis is accurate. BRUE is characterized by a sudden, brief episode involving changes in responsiveness, breathing, or skin color in infants under 1 year of age, without an identifiable cause at the time of the incident. A potential cause like sepsis is essential to consider in the differential diagnosis, as infections are a leading issue in infants that can lead to these kinds of events. Proper recognition of potential underlying conditions is critical, as these could necessitate further evaluation and management.

In contrast, BRUE does not apply to children older than 1 year of age, as it is specifically defined for infants lower than that threshold. The inclusion of seizures as a common complaint is also misleading since BRUE is defined to exclude conditions that would typically warrant seizure assessments. Lastly, while maintaining an appropriate oxygen saturation level is important in general clinical care, BRUE does not specifically dictate that SpO2 must be maintained at or above 90 percent, as the context of the event and subsequent assessment will guide this determination.